<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Cryptographically Secure Voting	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://followmyvote.com/cryptographically-secure-voting-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://followmyvote.com/cryptographically-secure-voting-2/</link>
	<description>Blockchain Voting Pioneers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 01:50:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tessie		</title>
		<link>https://followmyvote.com/cryptographically-secure-voting-2/#comment-3193</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tessie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://followmyvote.com/?page_id=4403#comment-3193</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://followmyvote.com/cryptographically-secure-voting-2/#comment-3191&quot;&gt;Samir Moussallem&lt;/a&gt;.

Kndloewge wants to be free, just like these articles!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://followmyvote.com/cryptographically-secure-voting-2/#comment-3191">Samir Moussallem</a>.</p>
<p>Kndloewge wants to be free, just like these articles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Will Ralphs		</title>
		<link>https://followmyvote.com/cryptographically-secure-voting-2/#comment-3192</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Ralphs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2017 00:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://followmyvote.com/?page_id=4403#comment-3192</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m stoked to see you guys working on such a well targeted project.. this is exactly what we need!
I am curious how the &#039;verifier&#039; is selected.   The best solution I could think of for verifier&#039;s would be for any verified user to be able to act as one, and then each verifier only receives segments of the data; the last 4 of the drivers license, and every 3rd letter of the name for example, and certain sections of the photo go to each verifier, so that no verifier ever receives a complete image of a person, or any other complete or useful information.
I would think 8 verifier&#039;s per submission on an active system would make sense; even if the verification needs to wait overnight for 8 to be available.  
It would be important that verifier selection did not occur at the time of the vote, as that could result in an organization getting all their users online to act as verifiers, and then they could authenticate fraudulent accounts.  
I think doing the verification in a manner similar to RAID would be the cleanest solution, assuming you have the user base.  (e.g. send redundant data to additional users both to improve security, and speed/reliability.) 
Fascinated to learn more about your project!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m stoked to see you guys working on such a well targeted project.. this is exactly what we need!<br />
I am curious how the &#8216;verifier&#8217; is selected.   The best solution I could think of for verifier&#8217;s would be for any verified user to be able to act as one, and then each verifier only receives segments of the data; the last 4 of the drivers license, and every 3rd letter of the name for example, and certain sections of the photo go to each verifier, so that no verifier ever receives a complete image of a person, or any other complete or useful information.<br />
I would think 8 verifier&#8217;s per submission on an active system would make sense; even if the verification needs to wait overnight for 8 to be available.<br />
It would be important that verifier selection did not occur at the time of the vote, as that could result in an organization getting all their users online to act as verifiers, and then they could authenticate fraudulent accounts.<br />
I think doing the verification in a manner similar to RAID would be the cleanest solution, assuming you have the user base.  (e.g. send redundant data to additional users both to improve security, and speed/reliability.)<br />
Fascinated to learn more about your project!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Samir Moussallem		</title>
		<link>https://followmyvote.com/cryptographically-secure-voting-2/#comment-3191</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samir Moussallem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 23:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://followmyvote.com/?page_id=4403#comment-3191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Sir, 

i have requirement for voteing soluation software, please send me more details and cost.

thanks for your support

Regards.

Samir]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir, </p>
<p>i have requirement for voteing soluation software, please send me more details and cost.</p>
<p>thanks for your support</p>
<p>Regards.</p>
<p>Samir</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>https://followmyvote.com/cryptographically-secure-voting-2/#comment-3190</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2016 01:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://followmyvote.com/?page_id=4403#comment-3190</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Consider this type of voter registartion fraud: Alice steals Bob&#039;s identity and registers Bob to vote with the Registrar. Later, Bob tries to register to vote but is denied because it appears he has already registered. How do you invalidate Bob&#039;s fraudulent Vote Key and issue him a new one?

Also, how can voters be sure that key generation is truly random, and no rouge agent can predict or &quot;easily&quot; guess the keys that the Registrar or Voting Booth are using to sign messages?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider this type of voter registartion fraud: Alice steals Bob&#8217;s identity and registers Bob to vote with the Registrar. Later, Bob tries to register to vote but is denied because it appears he has already registered. How do you invalidate Bob&#8217;s fraudulent Vote Key and issue him a new one?</p>
<p>Also, how can voters be sure that key generation is truly random, and no rouge agent can predict or &#8220;easily&#8221; guess the keys that the Registrar or Voting Booth are using to sign messages?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Will Long		</title>
		<link>https://followmyvote.com/cryptographically-secure-voting-2/#comment-3189</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Long]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 22:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://followmyvote.com/?page_id=4403#comment-3189</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://followmyvote.com/cryptographically-secure-voting-2/#comment-3188&quot;&gt;Jay Stewart&lt;/a&gt;.

Jay, Yes there are blockchain fees to add new transactions to the BitShares blockchain. You can view the fee schedule here: https://cryptofresh.com/fees]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://followmyvote.com/cryptographically-secure-voting-2/#comment-3188">Jay Stewart</a>.</p>
<p>Jay, Yes there are blockchain fees to add new transactions to the BitShares blockchain. You can view the fee schedule here: <a href="https://cryptofresh.com/fees" rel="nofollow ugc">https://cryptofresh.com/fees</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jay Stewart		</title>
		<link>https://followmyvote.com/cryptographically-secure-voting-2/#comment-3188</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Stewart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2016 19:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://followmyvote.com/?page_id=4403#comment-3188</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is there a charge to vote via the Bitshares blockchain? If so, what would the charge be?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a charge to vote via the Bitshares blockchain? If so, what would the charge be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
