<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>transparency Archives - Follow My Vote</title>
	<atom:link href="https://followmyvote.com/tag/transparency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://followmyvote.com/tag/transparency/</link>
	<description>Blockchain Voting Pioneers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:40:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>San Francisco Ready for Voting Upgrade</title>
		<link>https://followmyvote.com/san-francisco-ready-voting-upgrade/</link>
					<comments>https://followmyvote.com/san-francisco-ready-voting-upgrade/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tylerm93]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blockchain voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online voting platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://followmyvote.com/?p=12789</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It appears that San Francisco is ready for a voting upgrade. A recent op-ed in the San Francisco Examiner implores the city to move to an end-to-end verifiable voting system. The authors express concern about purchasing another expensive and private contract for outdated voting machines. We have a proposal: Follow My Vote! &#8220;San Francisco is [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://followmyvote.com/san-francisco-ready-voting-upgrade/">San Francisco Ready for Voting Upgrade</a> appeared first on <a href="https://followmyvote.com">Follow My Vote</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that San Francisco is ready for a voting upgrade. A recent op-ed in the <a href="https://www.sfexaminer.com/public-transparent-voting-system-san-francisco/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">San Francisco Examiner</a> implores the city to move to an end-to-end verifiable voting system. The authors express concern about purchasing another expensive and private contract for outdated voting machines. We have a proposal: Follow My Vote!</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;San Francisco is due for a new voting system. For years, we have relied on private vendor contracts with expensive licensing fees for software that is highly secretive. Instead of taking on another one of these “black box” contracts, San Francisco has an opportunity to lead the country and develop our own fully transparent voting system.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<h4>Digital Paper Trail</h4>
<p>The authors suggest, &#8220;It would be a paper-ballot system using open-source software running on commercial, off-the-shelf hardware.&#8221; Follow My Vote already uses <a href="https://followmyvote.com/open-source-code/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">open-source code</a>. This is fundamental to having an end-to-end verifiable election. If people cannot view the code being used, voter privacy and security could be compromised. Further, San Francisco would not need to buy any commercial hardware. Since we are 100 percent online, voters can use their current devices. This would result in cost-savings for the city.</p>
<h4><span style="line-height: 1.5;">Costs</span></h4>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">&#8220;San Francisco’s process for upgrading its voting machines has always been to purchase a proprietary system from one of a few voting machine companies.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">&#8220;Each year, we have to pay high licensing fees for software that is both outdated and completely secret.&#8221;</span></p></blockquote>
<p>Elections cost money. There will never be a way to completely eliminate all costs. However, we can increase efficiency through the use of online voting. In a study we did at Follow My Vote, states are spending roughly $5 per ballot. There would be no more need for IT maintenance and scrapping for used parts when voting machines fail. <a href="https://followmyvote.com/cost-savings/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cost savings</a> abound when we switch to online voting.</p>
<h4>Transparency</h4>
<p>The authors say they do not want to deal with any more &#8220;black box&#8221; contracts. Since we use blockchain technology, voters casts their vote which is stored on the blockchain. He or she can then audit their own ballot and all others. For more information, view the infographic below and visit our <a href="https://followmyvote.com/blockchain-voting-the-end-to-end-process/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">blockchain voting</a> page.</p>
<p><a href="https://followmyvote.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/End-to-End-Verified-Blockchain-Voting-Follow-My-Vote.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-9804 size-full" src="https://followmyvote.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/End-to-End-Verified-Blockchain-Voting-Follow-My-Vote.jpg" alt="End to End Verified Blockchain Voting - Follow My Vote" width="800" height="1200" /></a></p>
<h4>Eco-Friendly</h4>
<p>It is no surprise that conducting elections on paper, where millions participate, can have severe <a href="https://followmyvote.com/environmentally-friendly/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">environmental impacts</a>. In the U.S., roughly 126 million American voted in 2012. Many states even require that a paper ballot be printed for every registered voter. This leaves millions of unused ballots wasted.</p>
<p>Rough estimates indicate:</p>
<ul>
<li>1,185 tons of wood used</li>
<li>10,950,000 gallons of water consumed</li>
<li>17,250 million BTUs of energy used</li>
<li>981,800 pounds of solid waste produced</li>
</ul>
<p>If San Francisco really wants to take a stand for the environment, they should switch to online voting where electricity is already being used anyway.</p>
<p>At Follow My Vote, we are developing an open source, end-to-end verifiable voting system. Vote where you count, and sign up below for the 2016 Parallel Presidential Election. Help us make history in 2016.</p>
<p><strong>About the author:</strong> Tyler Molihan is a Marketing Intern at Follow My Vote. He hopes to increase awareness about the benefits of online voting systems.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://followmyvote.com/san-francisco-ready-voting-upgrade/">San Francisco Ready for Voting Upgrade</a> appeared first on <a href="https://followmyvote.com">Follow My Vote</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://followmyvote.com/san-francisco-ready-voting-upgrade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blockchain Voting in Utah? Pics or it Didn&#8217;t Happen</title>
		<link>https://followmyvote.com/2016-presidential-race-blockchain-voting-utah/</link>
					<comments>https://followmyvote.com/2016-presidential-race-blockchain-voting-utah/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tylerm93]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 21:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blockchain voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://followmyvote.com/?p=12687</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Both parties headed West on Tuesday with the Republican party using blockchain voting in Utah. This was one of the first times that online voting has been allowed via a state party. With around 59,000 people, CryptoCoinNews reported that Utah Republicans signed up in numbers. It would indeed seem like a momentous day for any and all advocates that wish [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://followmyvote.com/2016-presidential-race-blockchain-voting-utah/">Blockchain Voting in Utah? Pics or it Didn&#8217;t Happen</a> appeared first on <a href="https://followmyvote.com">Follow My Vote</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both parties headed West on Tuesday with the Republican party using blockchain voting in Utah. This was one of the first times that online voting has been allowed via a state party. With around 59,000 people, <a href="https://www.ccn.com/blockchain-tech-enables-utah-republicans-vote-candidate/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">CryptoCoinNews</a> reported that Utah Republicans signed up in numbers. It would indeed seem like a momentous day for any and all advocates that wish for a more transparent and verifiable voting system. However, things went rather poorly in Utah on Tuesday night, and the transparency seems iffy, at best.</p>
<p>First, Utah is a <a href="https://followmyvote.com/the-difference-between-primaries-and-caucuses/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">closed caucus</a>. This essentially means that you must be a registered party member to participate. The company contracted to establish the blockchain voting system for Utah&#8217;s GOP was Smartmatic. Strangely, we could not find a single <span style="background-color: #ffffff;">mention or explanation </span>of blockchain technology on Smartmatic&#8217;s website.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Smartmatic will use a private blockchain along with end-to-end encryption, enabling registered Republicans in Utah to cast their vote online.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; Samburaj Das, <a href="https://www.ccn.com/blockchain-tech-enables-utah-republicans-vote-candidate/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">CCN.LA</a></p></blockquote>
<p>With the Utah GOP using a closed caucus, does this mean that only Republican voters can audit their own vote? A <a href="https://www.wired.com/2016/03/security-experts-arent-going-like-utahs-online-primary/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">WIRED</a> article mentions that Smartmatic did create a bulletin board for each voter to verify that their vote was cast correctly&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="https://followmyvote.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Utah-GOP-Blockchain-Follow-My-Vote.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-12714"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-12714 size-full aligncenter" src="https://followmyvote.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Utah-GOP-Blockchain-Follow-My-Vote.jpg" alt="Utah GOP Blockchain - Follow My Vote" width="800" height="432" /></a></p>
<p>It is a step in the right direction, but what about being able to audit the entire election?  If you wanted to independently audit the election results, Republican or not, would you have been able to do so yesterday, or even today for that matter? These are fundamental questions that need to be answered.</p>
<p>Adding insult to injury, it appears that online voters in Utah experienced multiple problems yesterday. Utah voters actually reached out to Follow My Vote yesterday for help with casting their vote. However, since we are not providing them with voting services, we were unable to help. Multiple outlets are reporting that many voters experienced error messages when casting their ballot, while some could not even verify their ID.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;As of Tuesday night, party officials said about 10,000 of the 40,000 Utahns who applied to vote online were rejected because their IDs couldn&#8217;t be verified.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; Amber Phillips, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/22/utah-republicans-are-holding-a-first-ever-online-primary-and-its-not-going-so-well/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Washington Post </a></p></blockquote>
<p>To ensure true transparency yesterday, Follow My Vote would have made sure that all of the code was open source.  To make things completely transparent, we would also have allowed anyone to audit the entire blockchain-based ballot box, while keeping each vote anonymous. By allowing complete transparency and end-to-end verifiability, there would be little left to question about election results.</p>
<h3>Democratic Party</h3>
<p>The Democratic Party had <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/2016-election-results/us-primaries/?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-low_0322-elex-graphic%3Aelections-2016%2Fstate-single" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">128 delegates</a> up for grabs in Arizona, Idaho and Utah yesterday. Arizona was a primary, while Utah and Idaho were caucuses. Bernie Sanders actually had the better night, with convincing victories over Hilary Clinton in Idaho and Utah. He carried around 80 percent of the vote in both states and collected 67 new delegates. Sanders&#8217; total increased to 937, which still leaves him with quite a bit of work to do if he is to catch up to Clinton. However, more of these convincing victories are what he will need going forward.</p>
<p>Clinton won the Arizona primary and collected 51 new delegates. This puts her total at 1,681 and her lead seems as steady as it was before Tuesday&#8217;s results.</p>
<p>Next up: Democrats have 3 caucuses in Washington, Alaska, and Hawaii on March 26th.</p>
<h3>Republican Party</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/election/primaries" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Republicans</a> had the Arizona Primary and Utah Caucus last night. 98 new delegates were up for grabs. Donald Trump was heavily favored to win Arizona, and met those expectations taking 47 percent of the vote. Trump&#8217;s delegate total increased by 58, putting him at 739. Ted Cruz won Utah with 69 percent of the vote and took 40 new delegates. Cruz&#8217;s total sits at 465. John Kasich collected no new delegates. His delegate total sits at 143. Much like Clinton, this continues to be Trump&#8217;s race to lose.</p>
<p>Next up: Republicans have the Wisconsin primary on April 5th.</p>
<p>At Follow My Vote, we are developing an open source, end-to-end verifiable voting system. Vote where you count, and sign up below for the 2016 Parallel Presidential Election. Help us make history in 2016.</p>
<p><strong>About the author:</strong> Tyler Molihan is a Marketing Intern at Follow My Vote. He hopes to increase awareness about the benefits of online voting systems.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://followmyvote.com/2016-presidential-race-blockchain-voting-utah/">Blockchain Voting in Utah? Pics or it Didn&#8217;t Happen</a> appeared first on <a href="https://followmyvote.com">Follow My Vote</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://followmyvote.com/2016-presidential-race-blockchain-voting-utah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
