<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Voting Laws Archives - Follow My Vote</title>
	<atom:link href="https://followmyvote.com/tag/voting-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://followmyvote.com/tag/voting-laws/</link>
	<description>Blockchain Voting Pioneers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 21:43:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>New Voting Restrictions Determine Election Outcomes</title>
		<link>https://followmyvote.com/new-voting-restrictions-determine-election-outcomes/</link>
					<comments>https://followmyvote.com/new-voting-restrictions-determine-election-outcomes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jkkersey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 21:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Restrictions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://followmyvote.com/?p=8211</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A study by the Brennan Center for Justice has demonstrated that the new voting laws instituted in North Carolina, Kansas, Virginia, and Florida could have changed the outcome of elections.  The voting laws, which ranged from eliminating same-day registration to requiring proof of citizenship at the poll booth, are said to have disproportionately affected specific [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://followmyvote.com/new-voting-restrictions-determine-election-outcomes/">New Voting Restrictions Determine Election Outcomes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://followmyvote.com">Follow My Vote</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">A study by the <a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/blog/how-much-difference-did-new-voting-restrictions-make-yesterdays-close-races">Brennan Center for Justice</a> has demonstrated that the new voting laws instituted in North Carolina, Kansas, Virginia, and Florida could have changed the outcome of elections.  The voting laws, which ranged from eliminating same-day registration to requiring proof of citizenship at the poll booth, are said to have disproportionately affected specific demographics.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><strong>North Carolina</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Voters in the Tar Heel state were subjected to some of the harshest electoral laws in the country, which eliminated seven early voting days and same-day registration, and prohibited voters from voting outside of their home precincts</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Although these new laws made voting less convenient across the board, Black voters, who are historically much more likely to take advantage of early voting, suffered the most.  </span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-size: 14pt;">In 2012, 700,00 voted during [the early voting days], including more than a quarter of all African-Americans who voted that year.  In 2012, 100,000 North Carolinians, almost a one-third of whom were African-American, voted using same-day registration, which was not available this year. And 7,500 voters cast their ballots outside of their home precincts that year.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The year the laws were enacted, state house speaker Thom Tillis beat Senator Kay Hagen by roughly 48,000 votes, a margin of 1.7 percent.  Ironically, Tillis helped to craft the very same voting restrictions that may have guaranteed him the win. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Kansas</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Just before the 2012 elections, new laws in Kansas made two major changes by implementing a strict photo ID law and requiring documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The results? More than 24,000 Kansans were “held in suspense” due to their failure to present the now-necessary proof of citizenship, and were not able to successfully register to vote. Overall Kansas voter turnout dropped 2 percent in 2012.  Many voters were unable to cast their ballots because they did not have a government-issued photo ID that was accepted under the new laws.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">In another close election, incumbent Governor Sam Brownback triumphed over adversary Paul Davis by a 2.8 percent margin, or 33,000 votes.    </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Virginia</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Virginians too faced stringent new photo ID laws in 2012 that impacted elections.  </span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-size: 14pt;">According to the Virginia Board of Elections, 198,000 “active Virginia voters” did not have acceptable IDs this year.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">While the data is not yet available, if national averages hold, the photo ID laws would have accounted for a decrease in voter turnout of 2.4 percent, which equates to 52,000 Virginians.  </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Remarkably, Senator Mark Warner came away with a win over Ed Gillespie by a mere 0.6 percent margin, or 12,000 votes. In other words, if only 6 percent of those Virginians that were unable to vote due to the new laws had voted against Warner, Gillespie would have secured the win.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Florida</strong></span> <span style="font-size: 12pt;">Florida recently implemented what is arguably the most extreme of all in the wave of new voting restrictions.  </span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Perhaps the most significant for this election was a decision by Scott and his clemency board to make it virtually impossible for the more than 1.3 million Floridians who were formerly convicted of crimes but have done their time and paid their debt to society to have their voting rights restored.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">According to a joint study by the Human Rights Watch and  the Sentencing Project, the new laws meant that one in three Black Floridians was, for all intents and purposes, permanently disenfranchised.  </span> <span style="font-size: 12pt;">In the gubernatorial election, Rick Scott beat out former Governor Charlie Crist by just 72,000 votes. </span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Ironically, Scott had rolled back rights that were expanded under Governor Crist, who had established a path for people with past convictions to more easily get their voting rights restored. Under that process, more than 150,000 citizens had their rights restored before Scott changed the rules.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><!-- ======================================================================================= --></p>
<p><!-- place exactly one copy of everything above these lines in the head section of your page --></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://followmyvote.com/new-voting-restrictions-determine-election-outcomes/">New Voting Restrictions Determine Election Outcomes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://followmyvote.com">Follow My Vote</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://followmyvote.com/new-voting-restrictions-determine-election-outcomes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>United States Voting Laws In 2015</title>
		<link>https://followmyvote.com/united-states-voting-laws-in-2015/</link>
					<comments>https://followmyvote.com/united-states-voting-laws-in-2015/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Long]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Presidential Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Laws]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://followmyvote.com/?p=5213</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Next year Americans will be voting for the 2016 presidential candidates. Currently state legislators are examining and looking at hundreds of laws that pertain to voting. Some states are increasing voting restrictions, while others are improving access to the polls. Some of the more notable laws are written about voter ID requirements, early voting opportunities [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://followmyvote.com/united-states-voting-laws-in-2015/">United States Voting Laws In 2015</a> appeared first on <a href="https://followmyvote.com">Follow My Vote</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next year Americans will be voting for the 2016 presidential candidates. Currently state legislators are examining and looking at hundreds of laws that pertain to voting. Some states are increasing voting restrictions, while others are improving access to the polls. Some of the more notable laws are written about voter ID requirements, early voting opportunities and improving voter registration. See our list below for a more detailed review of current laws and bills.</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2084 aligncenter" src="https://followmyvote.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/iStock_000004488809Medium-1-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" srcset="https://followmyvote.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/iStock_000004488809Medium-1-300x199.jpg 300w, https://followmyvote.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/iStock_000004488809Medium-1-1024x679.jpg 1024w, https://followmyvote.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/iStock_000004488809Medium-1-768x509.jpg 768w, https://followmyvote.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/iStock_000004488809Medium-1-1536x1018.jpg 1536w, https://followmyvote.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/iStock_000004488809Medium-1-720x477.jpg 720w, https://followmyvote.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/iStock_000004488809Medium-1.jpg 1702w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<h2>Restrictive Voting Laws</h2>
<ul>
<li>The following states have introduced bills requiring<strong> photo ID</strong> at the polls.
<ul>
<li>Alaska, Connecticut, Indiana, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, Texas, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia.</li>
<li>Bills are active in North Dakota, Virginia, and Washington.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills requiring <strong>proof of citizenship</strong>.
<ul>
<li>Maryland, Virginia, Washington.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills making <strong>voter registration more difficult</strong>.
<ul>
<li>Connecticut, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Washington.</li>
<li>A bill is active in Washington.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills making it<strong> harder for students to vote.</strong>
<ul>
<li>New Hampshire.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills <strong>reducing access to absentee ballots</strong>
<ul>
<li>Indiana, Texas, Virginia.</li>
<li>Bills are active in Virginia.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills that <strong>limit protections for voter purges</strong>.(eligible votes can be taken out of the ballot)
<ul>
<li>Virginia, Washington. As of February 3, 2015, a bill is active in Virginia.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills that increase the <strong>probability of longer lines</strong>. (less time to vote and fewer resources.)
<ul>
<li>New Jersey.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills limiting <strong>barriers to rights restoration</strong>. (a criminal regaining the right to vote.)
<ul>
<li>New York.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills <strong>blocking eligible voters</strong>. (the likelihood that they will vote is less)
<ul>
<li> Mississippi.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h2>Laws Enhancing Voter Access.</h2>
<ul>
<li>The following states have introduced bills <strong>modernizing voter registration</strong>.
<ul>
<li>Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington, Washington D.C.</li>
<li>Bills are active in Oregon and Washington.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills improving <strong>electronic registration</strong>.
<ul>
<li>Georgia, Indiana, New Mexico, Oregon.</li>
<li>A bill is active in Oregon.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills improving <strong>online registration</strong>.
<ul>
<li>Florida, Iowa, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New York, Texas, Washington, Washington D.C.</li>
<li>Bills are active in Washington.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills improving <strong>s</strong><strong>ame-day registration</strong>.
<ul>
<li>Georgia, Nebraska, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington.</li>
<li>A bill is active in Washington.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills improving <strong>portability</strong>.(Ease of address change within the state)
<ul>
<li>Nebraska, New Jersey, New York.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills improving <strong>registration opportunities</strong>.
<ul>
<li>Georgia, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Texas, Washington.</li>
<li>A bill is active in Oregon.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills for <strong>pre-registering students to vote</strong>.
<ul>
<li>Arizona, Indiana, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Virginia, Washington.</li>
<li>Bills are active in Oregon and Washington.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills increasing <strong>early voting opportunities</strong>.
<ul>
<li>Arizona, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Virginia.</li>
<li>A bill is active in New Jersey.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills <strong>restoring voting rights. </strong>(opportunities are expanded for criminals to regain voting rights)
<ul>
<li>Arizona, Florida, Kentucky, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Texas, Virginia, Wyoming.</li>
<li>Bills are active in Virginia and Wyoming.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills that will make <strong>ID laws less restrictive. </strong>
<ul>
<li>Georgia, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia.</li>
<li>A bill is active in Virginia.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills makes it more convenient for <b>students to vote. </b>
<ul>
<li>Kansas and New York.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills that <strong>reduce long lines </strong>and allow for ballots to be cast at other polling places.
<ul>
<li>Georgia and Virginia.</li>
<li>A bill is active in Virginia.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills <strong>improving disability access</strong>.
<ul>
<li>Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Virginia, Washington.</li>
<li>Bills are active in Montana, Virginia, and Washington.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills <strong>improving use for other languages</strong>.
<ul>
<li>New York.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills <strong>improving access for military voters</strong>.
<ul>
<li>Florida, Missouri, New Jersey, New Mexico, South Carolina, Virginia.</li>
<li>A bill is active in Missouri.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills <strong>expanding access to absentee ballots</strong>.</li>
<li>Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Virginia.</li>
<li>Bills are active in New Hampshire and Virginia.</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills <strong>improving voter list maintenance</strong>. (protects against wrongful removal)
<ul>
<li>Virginia.
<div id="ftn34"></div>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills <strong>preventing deceptive practices</strong>.
<ul>
<li>New Jersey, Texas.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The following states have introduced bills <strong>ensuring votes are counted</strong>.
<ul>
<li>Arizona, New York, Virginia.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-2015" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Brennan Center For Justice.</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://followmyvote.com/united-states-voting-laws-in-2015/">United States Voting Laws In 2015</a> appeared first on <a href="https://followmyvote.com">Follow My Vote</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://followmyvote.com/united-states-voting-laws-in-2015/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
